U.S. Government Turns Up the Heat on Window Film Usage, Testing

February 4th, 2015 by Casey Flores

The federal government’s confidence in window film continues.

Besides funding a new rating system, the Department of Energy (DOE) recently released a report “Windows and Building Envelope Research and Development: Roadmap for Emerging Technologies,” which includes window film as one of those technologies.

Specifically, the report lists window film as a “high priority” research and development area, stating window films’ projected installation price less than or equal to $2 per square foot, is much more efficient than replacing an insulating glass unit. The performance target is to “demonstrate a reduction in the solar heat gain coefficient by greater than 0.4 with a visual transmittance bleached state greater than 0.6 for the residential sector and greater than 0.4 for the commercial sector.”

According to the DOE, window film has a five year payback period when used residentially and a 22 year payback period for commercial use.

According to the DOE, window film has a five year payback period when used residentially and a 22 year payback period for commercial use.

This is all part of the DOE’s Building Technologies Office’s (BTO) mission “to improve the efficiency of existing and new buildings in both the residential and commercial sector through the development of high-impact energy efficiency technologies and practices.” The initiative began after President Obama’s 2013 inaugural address, in which he issued a new national goal of reducing energy losses in buildings by 50 percent in the next 20 years.

Window film will play a major role in achieving that goal, as “low-E window films have sizable technical potential savings with reasonable payback periods,” according to the report.
But the DOE isn’t the only governmental entity investing in window film. The General Services Administration (GSA), which oversees workplaces of federal employees, is also utilizing window film in its practices.

As part of its Green Proving Ground Program, the GSA has commissioned Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory to perform real-world measurement and verification of low-E films in a pilot installation in a federally-owned building.

Findings will be available in 2016 and the full report on what’s planned can be found here.

Darrell Smith, executive director of the International Window Film Association (IWFA), says the government using more window film is a natural extension of the association’s work with the agencies.

 “The IWFA works continually with both DOE and GSA on programs to utilize window film, for energy efficiency as well as for enhanced protection from flying glass fragments whenever glass breaks due to natural or manmade events,” he says. “IWFA and manufacturer representatives are invited and participate actively in information gathering and brainstorming activities sponsored by different groups within DOE.”

This article is from Focus on Film, the weekly e-newsletter that covers the latest news regarding window film and related products, including paint protection film. Click HERE to sign up—there is no charge. Interested in a deeper dive? Free subscriptions to Window Film magazine in print or digital format are available. Subscribe at no charge HERE.

Tags: , , ,

3 comments
Leave a comment »

  1. $2/ per square foot is what we charged for big commercial jobs 25 years ago. These days the film alone can cost that much. The payback period seems very wrong when using the $2.00 number. Is this number only related to cool season heat loss? The biggest advantage with film is the savings during hot weather. And the biggest advantage for many of my customers is the fact that the film allows them to keep the home more evenly cooled. Room with the glass is too hot and other rooms are too cold.

  2. Larry,

    We agree – $2/sf is low. Perhaps they’re talking about materials only and not labor? But it’s what the report said.

  3. 6.50 a square foot is cheap. If they pay you with a credit card over the phone you lose 4%

Leave Comment